Comparing submission or application software for grants, awards, or other programs? See how Submittable compares to the competition.
Submittable vs. SurveyMonkey Apply
Compared to SurveyMonkey Apply, Submittable is more highly-rated on trusted software review sites for ease of use.
Plus, SurveyMonkey Apply charges customers per program—whereas over a third of Submittable customers end up using the platform for something beyond their original use case, getting more bang for their buck.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. SurveyMonkey Apply
Submittable vs. Wizehive
Wizehive relies on plugins to do many things, including auto emails, bulk emails, charity validation, third party references, assignments management, and creating submitter and reviewer portals.
Submittable, on the other hand, offers all of these capabilities out-of-the-box—no need to set anything up. Which is part of why Submittable is more highly-rated on trusted software review sites.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. Wizehive
Submittable vs. Fluxx
Implementing Fluxx’s grantmaking software is a time-intensive process, and administrators on Fluxx also need to write in code. Additionally, Fluxx is only partially mobile-responsive for applicants.
Programs on Submittable’s grant management software can be up and running fast. Administrators never need to write code, and Submittable is fully mobile-responsive.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. Fluxx
Submittable vs. Google Forms
Google Forms is a very popular free form builder used to collect surveys and simple applications.
For teams who make decisions on submissions, Submittable’s far more robust feature suite—encompassing in-app communication, simple and custom reviews, charity validation, workflow automation tools, and reporting—is a better solution.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. Google Forms
Submittable vs. Blackbaud Grantmaking
Unlike Blackbaud’s 34 separate and distinct products, Submittable is a single, out-of-the-box solution. So it has a much faster time-to-launch, is a better value, and has better ratings for ease of use and customer support.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. Blackbaud Grantmaking
Submittable vs. SmartSimple
SmartSimple does not have a drag-and-drop form builder. To perform some actions in SmartSimple, users use programming languages like JavaScript and HTML.
With Submittable, on the other hand, you can create sophisticated, custom online forms with visual, drag-and-drop tools. Across the platform, there’s no coding required.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. SmartSimple
Submittable vs. SlideRoom
Unlike SlideRoom, Submittable includes a charity validation tool, eligibility screening, and many other features that make the application submission and review process more efficient for everyone involved.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. SlideRoom
Submittable vs. Foundant
Submittable has several key compliance and security certifications that Foundant lacks, which organizations appreciate not only for their own peace of mind, but for the privacy of applicant data.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. Foundant
Submittable vs. OpenWater
Submittable’s social impact software offers resources and features optimized for programs that provide funding, such as grants, scholarships, and awards. OpenWater, by contrast, has pivoted to virtual conferences.
→ Learn more about Submittable vs. OpenWater
Level up your submission or application process
Contact our team to see what you could accomplish with Submittable.
Natalya is the director of product marketing at Submittable and is focused on helping organizations get a ton of value out of the platform. She is a bookworm, adventure enthusiast and card-carrying cat lady as well as a writer and yogi.